@Taylor Kendal do you have a recommendation for a specific, concrete way we'd be best positioned to engage and contribute to OWF?
Taylor Kendal
•
Jul 3, 2025
It really hasn’t been on my radar for the past year, so I’m not entirely sure. Seems the easiest, most concrete thing would be to enter the proposal process (not sure if that’s LC broadly or maybe VetPass?). Reality is that it would take someone devoting consistent technical energy and expertise in order to establish visibility and build a reputation in the community.
Unfortunately, it’s the enterprise players (see HERE) who have the time/resources and end up driving trends and adoption, even when OWF claims to be neutral and open to everyone. Chicken or egg… need scale to commit resources, need resources to achieve scale.
Ok if timing isn’t right, but could tell from the Geneva event that OWF was still a big signal generator and others like DCC/LCW and VNF were elevated and at the table.
Comments2
Jacksón Smith
Jul 3, 2025
@Taylor Kendal do you have a recommendation for a specific, concrete way we'd be best positioned to engage and contribute to OWF?
Taylor Kendal
Jul 3, 2025
It really hasn’t been on my radar for the past year, so I’m not entirely sure. Seems the easiest, most concrete thing would be to enter the proposal process (not sure if that’s LC broadly or maybe VetPass?). Reality is that it would take someone devoting consistent technical energy and expertise in order to establish visibility and build a reputation in the community.
Unfortunately, it’s the enterprise players (see HERE) who have the time/resources and end up driving trends and adoption, even when OWF claims to be neutral and open to everyone. Chicken or egg… need scale to commit resources, need resources to achieve scale.
Ok if timing isn’t right, but could tell from the Geneva event that OWF was still a big signal generator and others like DCC/LCW and VNF were elevated and at the table.